Wednesday, May 26, 2010

And I'd check the watermark on the paper if I were you.


That 2004 Harper coalition proposal, and the more recent one when others proposed something similar? Totally, totally different. Because shut up.

And fuck off. That, too.

OH, DEAR: The comments section there is a must-read. Seriously.

4 comments:

Sparky said...

"nowhere does Stephen Harper suggest that the three opposition parties wish to form a government. NOWHERE"
That's his proof? 'Cause Harper didn't use the word 'coalition' in his letter?? Can these people even read??
That's like dismissing facts 'cause someone used quotation marks around a paraphrase...

Anonymous said...

Can these people even read??
Some can read but the bigger question is if they understand.


That answer is "no".

CC said...

"Hey, I'm not saying that I'll kill your family if you testify. I'm just saying that that's a nice family you got there, and it'd be a shame if anything happened to them."

(Time passes.)

"Your Honour, I can assure you that at no time did my client explicitly threaten the victim. Never. Not one word."

Christ, but these people are fucking stupid.

double nickel said...

And right on cue...twatsy appears.