As the embarrassingly senile Sandy Crux is getting publicly spanked by her not-retarded commenters, we find a puzzling addition to that post that I'm sure wasn't there before:
H/T NNW and written with tongue firmly planted in cheek.
Tongue in cheek? Is Sandy now using the Ann Coulter defense? You know, "Sure, I suggested a Supreme Court Justice should be poisoned but -- ha ha -- can't you folks take a joke?" Is that what's happening here? It was all just a joke, Sandy? You were never serious?
Fuck, but that's lame.
JUST A JOKE: It's getting seriously tiring to watch Canada's wanknuts post something asinine, get called on it, then try to walk away from it by shrugging it off as an attempt at humour. Bloated windbag and drug addict Rush Limbaugh tried that once, with ugly results, but the neat thing is that we can use the same rebuttal here.
If Sandy wants to pass off that piece of literary swill as "tongue in cheek," then maybe she can explain where the humour is. Because I don't see humour -- I see childish and petulant whining that even her fellow wanknut "Hunter" takes seriously. So, Sandy, where's the funny? Feel free to fill us in.
P.S. Should we take bets on when Sandy slams down the moderation shutters? You know it's coming.
I AM CC, THE GREAT AND POWERFUL: Yes, out of sheer embarrassment, Sandy removed that entire post. I will now be accused of savagely and viciously attacking an old woman, driving her to pathetic and pitiful tears. You know it's coming.
4 comments:
Ugly is as ugly does and the repellent aesthetics of that website extend to the content of Cruxifix posts.
The Crux link is broken or the post has been removed.
Umm.. it would appear that she'd deleted the whole story.
Should we take bets on when Sandy slams down the moderation shutters? You know it's coming.
Zounds, foiled again, Canadian Cynic. She disappeared the post.
Post a Comment