Friday, November 21, 2008

There are no words ...


Yo, Hunter! How's that moist-panty Sarah Palin worshipping going?



I need a word beyond "retarded."

P.S. "In my role as governor, that's what my plans are all around." She's an illiterate moron. Seriously, she is utterly incapable of simple speech. Fuck, what an idiot. And the Blogging Tories adore her. Go figure.

25 comments:

mauser98 said...

God bless Mike Harris.

Zorpheous said...

I need a word beyond "retarded."

I believe the word you looking for is "Bushed" or maybe "Palinned"

deBeauxOs said...

Bwahahahahaha!

TURKEYS DIE AS GOVERNOR PALIN TAKES QUESTIONS FROM MEDIA

Great optics! This confirms her place in history as the Marie Antoinette of the Republican Party.

Southern Quebec said...

A Les Nessman moment...

liberal supporter said...

They're busily spinning turkeygate as "you latte liberals don't even know where your food comes from". But of course it is not a question of factory farming practices. It is a question of her being so self absorbed and focused on the camera that she is oblivious to all around her. She would have exactly the same "me me me" routine if the background was a scene of hurricane destruction or of protesters being mown down by machine guns.

Yes, Marie Antoinette indeed.

Shannon said...

Ew! Please warn me about video of animal slaughtering!

Am very glad to be vegetarian today. Very very glad.

liberal supporter said...

Aw, SQ beat me to it. I was going to go with: It seems the Republicans are saying about Sarah in general "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly".


Hey SQ, I see you were put in your place at hunter's by Beq.

It is strange, given their belief we are mental incompetents, that it was never considered that "sawah" could be a typo, given that "r" and "w" are two keyboard positions apart.

Plus the criterion "you wouldn't say it to someone's face" is laughable. If you called Bible Spice "sawah" she would wink and warm right up to you, since you are speaking her dialect.

Not to mention the fact that referring to "steffi" or "iggy" or "Boob Rae" is de rigueur there, because it is sniggeringly funny, just a joke and why are you lefties getting your panties in a bunch.

Based on this "only say what you would say to their face", it would be fun watching "alberta girl" or "west coast teddi" (can't recall which) talk face to face with Jeff, because they always call him "jeffy", "dear" and especially "sweetie". Would they talk to him like that if Mrs. Davidson was present as well?

They're such a hoot to read really. I always find the self importance amusing, but the hilarity comes from the indignation when someone simply pokes holes in their narratives. The cries for civility and reasoned debate always go out the window when it is time for their feeding frenzied attacks on the wrong thinking.

Yes, engaging them seems pointless, but laughing at them is always fun.

KEvron said...

the lady knows her audience.

KEvron

KEvron said...

"...the aristocrats!"

KEvron

BC WaterBoy said...

Remember the MR. Bean episode where he cooks a turkey and then gets it stuck on his head?

Jinx McHue said...

I need a word beyond "retarded."

How about a phrase: "Canadian Cynic."

CC said...

Hey, Jinx, how's it going? Taking a break from molesting your kids to check in on the real bloggers?

P.S. Jinx McHue is, in reality, Blogging Tory "Neo Conservative." But I'm guessing you'd figured that out by now.

Jinx McHue said...

Wow, CC. You've become an even bigger hate-filled piece of shit than ever. And even more stupid, too. To wit:

P.S. Jinx McHue is, in reality, Blogging Tory "Neo Conservative." But I'm guessing you'd figured that out by now.

No, I'm actually not.

CC said...

> Wow, CC. You've become an even bigger hate-filled piece of shit than ever. And even more stupid, too.

And yet, Neo, darling, here you are, irresistibly drawn. Go figure. Now why don't you toddle off and celebrate the murder of more Toronto minorities or something? That's a good little bigot.

Jinx McHue said...

Dude, I'm in Minnesota, not Canada. Your stupidity has passed all bounds of belief.

liberal supporter said...

This is absolutely priceless.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

KEvron said...

neo-cunt wrote a post about cc and anonymous commentors.

i'll be posting "anonymously" there from now on.

KEvron

liberal supporter said...

He has the "free speech" banner on his blog, while busily deleting any comment that says any truth he doesn't want to see. Sometimes it is difficult because one of his other commenters responds before he deletes, asking for more information. Then he has to delete the whole sequence, or make one of his regulars look weird since the comment makes no sense without the deleted one. It's hilarious watching him try to edit things so that the anon looks bad. Then he does the periodic "poor me" post with excerpts pulled from various comments taken out of context.


He's frustrated because the anon doesn't show up on his site meter, so he can't whine to ISPs or go on a hunting trip.


His "nonny" has not been back since Thursday, so now he waits hitting refresh, waiting for a comment, but very few come now. He's even posted about turkeygate, and of course wonders how anyone can't know where their food comes from.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

Jinx McHue said...

He has the "free speech" banner on his blog, while busily deleting any comment that says any truth he doesn't want to see.

Despite your retarded understanding of the concept, there is nothing wrong or hypocritical about that. Free speech in public is and should always be protected from government violation. You do not, however, have any protection of free speech in privately owned areas real or virtual. Just as you cannot enter someone's home or business and demand free speech rights there, you cannot enter another person's website and demand the same. Unfortunately, liberals tend to be too stupid to be able to fathom this distinction.

CC said...

Give it a rest, Neo ... don't you have some black people whose deaths you should be celebrating or something?

liberal supporter said...

"jinx McHue": Of course privately owned areas have no protection of free speech. The hypocrisy is that Neo claims on the front of his blog to be in support of free speech, yet he censors comments.

And we're not talking about the comments he so prominently displays in his endless "poor me" posts. I am referring to the comments that don't conform to his views. Unlike here, where CC will delete comments whose full content is something like "cc = canadian coward", but any other comment of more than a few words such as your own, stays. Cheap shots and all.

Your comment, for example, would not survive at Neo's, if it referred to his (or any of his commenters') "retarded understanding", or if it contained "conservatives tend to be too stupid to fathom this". I know, I know, it is the epitome of wittiness to work that into your carefully composed comment, yet Neo would summarily delete it and call you "cc-nonymous" in the process.

And since we've now established that "Neo" follows this blog, I will tell him that the reason I found it so absolutely priceless is that CC has decided you are in fact a sock puppet of Neo. Just like Neo repeatedly insists that I am CC. Even though I am not, and I say so every time he says I am. I actually think CC is wrong on Jinx being Neo, but CC is way more credible than you are. Neo is simply guessing. He can't track me so he would not be able to tell where I am. Maybe CC is untrackable too, which might explain neo's assumptions. But he is still wrong.

My purpose in anon commenting at Neo's the last three months has been to destroy his credibility and reveal his true self. That has been a resounding success, and with "Rose" demanding publication of my IP number so she can harass me or my ISP, my case is made. Neo of course can't produce the IP number so he now sounds like it's no big deal. But earlier in this exercise he was reproducing his complaint email to Rogers, then later his email to Sympatico. Too bad he's wrong on both. I haven't commented there at all since Nov 20th and now he's busy trying to milk this some more. But this game is done since I have achieved my objective.

Neo is now floating a theory that my blogger ID, which was created in October 2006, was created by CC just for the purpose of this current demonstration of Neo's ongoing hypocrisy. Of course there are BT's who have seen me since I created my blogger ID. I doubt they would think I am CC, mainly because I am not. But it is a bonus for sure. With that "theory" that it is all about him from over two years ago, I think even Neo's regular commenters are starting to wonder about his delusions of grandeur.

Hahahahahahahahaha!

CC said...

LS:

I do, of course, realize that Jinx McHue isn't Neo, but I'm having fun playing Neo's game in which he accuses every single critical commenter of being me, apparently because he can't fathom the idea of more than one person thinking he's a complete peckerwood.

For the record, I don't comment anywhere under any other name or anonymously. Ever. But I'm guessing that's a point of privilege utter retards like Neo will never understand.

Jinx McHue said...

Of course privately owned areas have no protection of free speech. The hypocrisy is that Neo claims on the front of his blog to be in support of free speech, yet he censors comments.

Are you honestly that stupid? You admit privately owned areas have no free speech protection, yet you seem to think it's wrong for someone to promote free speech while "censoring" comments on their personal blog. So you think that someone who supports free speech should guarantee free speech protection in all of their privately owned areas, which is exactly the opposite of what you originally stated.

liberal supporter said...

Thanks CC. I was wondering if you really thought Jinx was Neo and how you would have made that conclusion. Just seeing the create date of Jinx's id was the red flag for me. But Neo soldiers on, convinced that you created my id three months after Neo created his id.

I've also been accused of being RT when commenting as "liberal supporter". I think it was "biff" who made that conclusion based on being online about the same time of day.

It's funny that Neo is an atheist, yet acts like some religious types who see everyone they don't like as being manifestations of their faith's devil.

I think for someone like yourself with an actual blog it is important never to sock puppet or even comment anonymously. You are essentially a journalist and your reputation and integrity matters.

For someone like me, I comment here and there but since my blog is just a login home I will go anon since it is quicker than logging in. More importantly, it seems a lot of bloggers will simply attack whatever one says based on recognizing your handle.

Neo is one of the worst offenders in this, since any comment by someone he doesn't like invariably gets a response that amounts to channel changing like "but you said this last year so I don't have to listen to you now".

liberal supporter said...

Are you honestly that stupid?
Of course I am. But what does that make you, considering your argument and how you are attempting to present it? I am stupid, and I am sure you would admit you are a hypocrite, since you support Neo's hypocritical position.

You admit privately owned areas have no free speech protection
I "admitted" nothing. I agreed the obvious, that privately owned areas do not have free speech protection.

, yet you seem to think it's wrong for someone to promote free speech while "censoring" comments on their personal blog.
That's the second time you have mischaracterised my words. I don't think what neo does is "wrong". It is however hypocritical, despite your insults and attempts to put words in my mouth. He invites debate, and does not claim that he only wants to hear agreement with his views. He even claims to welcome "verbal sparring" yet he deletes comments if they do not cheer on his point of view.

Your quotes around the word "censor" implying that it is not really censorship shows you have bought his story about being harassed by obscenities and threats. He is lying. It is quite clearly any comment that does not fit his point of view that is deleted.

As I pointed out already, we're not talking about trollery. Your comments here would not pass there since they do not conform to his view. Deleting reasoned comment is denial of free speech, and his claim of supporting free speech is therefore hypocritical.



So you think that someone who supports free speech should guarantee free speech protection in all of their privately owned areas, which is exactly the opposite of what you originally stated.
No, I don't think so. A private area is not required to guarantee free speech, but it is reasonable to expect it, when supporting free speech is so prominently displayed on the main page.

Claiming to support free speech in the main page, then denying it selectively in the comments based on arbitrary standards is hypocritical. It is essentially a bait and switch.