The Cons claims here seem somewhat specious and suspicious.They're more worried about this one than they want us (and their base) to believe.I would suggest, as usual, to head over to Macleans Blog Central and read Kady O'Malley on these 'breaking developments'.
Big Jim (he's a bulky guy) is talkin' as if he were a participant in that conversation, and he wasn't even there as a witness. How the hell would he know how long the conversation lasted? From what we know of Harper, and his opinions about the press, can anyone imagine him staying still for ten minutes in front of a reporter with a microphone?Moore is scrambling to get a prominent seat in Harper's cabinet, so he's coming up with all kinds of what-if scenarios to please his boss. He's, like, fetching the stick before Stevie throws it in the hopes of being favorably noticed...
LuLu, with all due respect, you got this just ever so slightly wrong.It should read:"Fuck off...a hundred and one times, you lawsuit-happy, public-opinion-denying, free-speech-quashing, vote-buying, micromanaging, ass-kissing, dictatorial, hypocritical, fuckwitted, Republican toady"ahh, that's better.
Do you feel better now, Rev?
Post a Comment