Sunday, May 18, 2008

When stupid whingers blog.


Shorter stupid whinger: "Despite the fact that we whingers are opposed to contraception, the morning-after pill, abortion or family planning of any kind, clearly this is all the mother's fault."

AFTERSNARK: It's not even clear what that whackjob JoJo is pissing and moaning about. If you read the original article, it would appear that the unintended mother (let's call her "Mom") did everything by the book, whinger-wise.

First, she had three kids within a normal marriage -- apparently deliberately -- so it's clear that she loves children and is family-oriented. Not sure what JoJo and the rest of those whiny wanks have to complain about there so ... onward.

Next, at the age of 26, she realized that her family was in financial straits and couldn't afford another child so, acting entirely responsibly, she had a tubal ligation. And given that JoJo's right-wing screech harpy readers are constantly bitching about the financial burden placed on the rest of the state by mothers who have more children than they can afford, one would think that they should have nothing but praise for Mom, who went out of her way to see that she wouldn't represent that kind of burden. Again, what's to complain about?

Sadly, it turns out that the tubal ligation was botched and she ended up pregnant, anyway, so what to do? Well, she could have had an abortion but she chose not to, which you'd think would have made her an absolute heroine in the eyes of dumbass retards like JoJo. So what's the catch here?

Oh, right ... the fact that Mom thinks that, because someone fucked up the tubal ligation and she got pregnant, those responsible for the fucking up should help her with financial assistance to raise the child that she hadn't planned on but she was determined to raise, anyway.

So ... what the fuck is JoJo's beef? What exactly did Mom do wrong? I seriously don't get it. And yet, here we are, with JoJo being the perpetually complaining jerkwad she always is. God Almighty, but you just can't please some people, can you?

AH, LET THE SWIFTBOATING BEGIN. Not surprisingly, since JoJo and her neo-con fuckwit groupies can't denigrate Mom for anything she actually did, they're simply going to lie about her. Complete fuckwit JoJo writes:

How cold and unfeeling. Worse is the thought that this poor child could someday learn that not only was she unwanted, but that her mother actually went to court to sue for the burden that she represented.

But, as you can read in the original article:

"... The fact that (she) now treasures her unplanned child is irrelevant. It is relevant that she has to feed, clothe and educate her."

Precisely. It was Mom's decision that she didn't want to have any more kids but, because of a doctor's screwup, she had one, and she obviously loves it, but she's just taking the (reasonable) position that the person who was responsible for that pregnancy is legally obligated to help pay for it. I don't see the problem here, but JoJo clearly wants to paint the mother as an uncaring monster. And that fat fuck Dr. Roy piles on as well:

This is truly sad. This baby will grow up to know about this lawsuit. How can sshe not be damaged by the words of her own mother. She should have loved a loving and decent family to bring up this blessing from God... I meant given this baby to a loving family."

Once again, the child is obviously loved, all Mom is asking for is compensation to allow her to raise the child properly. Clearly, though, according to fat fuck Dr. Roy, that is just not a "loving and decent family." And from the original Post article, we have a horrific excuse for a human being, one Mary Ellen Douglas:

"If the mother treasures the child, how on earth can she say, 'I don't want to have to feed this child. I want the state or the courts to feed her, because she's such a terrible burden,' " asked Mary Ellen Douglas of the pro-life Campaign Life Coalition. "It's just so bizarre."

So if Mom had had an abortion, she would have been a baby killer. But since she chose to have the child and raise it and simply ask for financial help to do it, she's "bizarre." You just can't win with these hideous retards, can you?

In short, while Mom (as I have already described in detail) did absolutely everything by the neo-con playbook, she must still be destroyed and have her reputation dragged through the mud because ... because ... well, no one's quite sure. All we know is that she must be denigrated, and JoJo and her fellow liars and cretins are just the ones to do it. Because they're conservatives. It's what they do.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Oh, dear God ... how intellectually deranged do you have to be for even the NAMBLA-obsessed, child rape-promoting Richard Evans to suggest that you're being a bunch of dimbulbs? Seriously, that just made my Sunday, and I can put away the blogging keyboard for the rest of the day with a clear conscience.

JUST WHEN YOU THINK SHE CAN'T GET ANY STUPIDER
, JoJo responds to NAMBLA Dick thusly:

Richard, this isn’t like operating on the wrong kidney or something. We’re talking about a human being. Why do you suppose the mother didn’t simply give the child up for adoption?

So, to recap, on the one hand, because Mom had never intended to get pregnant again, she is to be vilified for perceiving the new arrival as a financial and emotional burden that she clearly doesn't want and won't love.

On the other hand, now that it's clear that Mom does want and love the new arrival, she is to be conversely denigrated for not doing the right thing and giving the young'un up for adoption.

Holy fuck, JoJo, but you're an asshole. Seriously, there's no other way to put it.

14 comments:

Red Tory said...

I believe that "society" is a co-defendant in JoJo's huffy indictment.

jj said...

"What exactly did Mom do wrong?"

She had sex for some other purpose than procreation.

Red Tory said...

The nerve!

LuLu said...

But, but, but ... Is it JoJo's position that she must be pilloried for not having an abortion? Isn't that normally a good thing in the tiny little minds of the BTs?

I'm so confused.

Red Tory said...

According to fatuous twit "dr. roy" the family is indecent and unloving.

Mike said...

Next, at the age of 26, she realized that her family was in financial straits and couldn't afford another child so, acting entirely responsibly, she had a tubal ligation. And given that JoJo's right-wing screech harpy readers are constantly bitching about the financial burden placed on the rest of the state by mothers who have more children than they can afford, one would think that they should have nothing but praise for Mom, who went out of her way to see that she wouldn't represent that kind of burden. Again, what's to complain about?

This hits too close to home for JoJo...that is the profile of women who have the majority of abortions in Canada and the US - not knocked up teenagers or "sluts" using it as a form of birth control, but women between 25 and 35, with at least one other child who are motivated by the need to ensure their already born children have a high quality of life.

Once again these morons demonstrate they are not just anti-abortion and anti-woman, they are anti-sex. They really just want to stop people from having sex for fun. They are ignorant prudes.

Mike said...

BTW citation:

Mentioned here and the study in question is here.

A quote:

"You might be surprised to learn that the young woman seeking an abortion in the United States today is not somebody's careless teenage daughter.

She is a mom.

She is in her 20s, she's attended college, she earns a manageable living and she is either living with the father or in a long-term relationship with him.

And she already has a child. "

Ti-Guy said...

Bah. It really is simply an issue of these fatuous twits and twats passing judgement over eveyrone else's lives because it makes them feel better and helps to distract from whatever personal issues they have (and being really dumb is, I'm sure, a burden that is difficult to bear).

We all know the type; they bore you to death with their witless prattle if they even have the guts to bring it up with you in person in the first place.

Get a life, TrueBlew and maybe ask that eunich who haunts your place why he hasn't graced the world with the miracle of life (as far as we know).

KEvron said...

jojo's really letting her hand slip on this one. what hand? why, she hates children and thinks of them as a burden. further, she's a misanthrope who wishes this burden she hates on other people.

KEvron

jj said...

The idea that pregnancy might be a disaster for someone who's already barely getting by is anathema to imbeciles like Joanne.

They oppose not only abortion, but birth control. And when a woman gets pregnant because of a doctor's incompetence, they oppose her right to be outraged about it. After all, she had the choice not to have sex.

That is really what these sickos think.

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

If this woman were to stay in the news long enough to be quoted saying something like (you'll see that this is very, very, very hypothetical) "God bless Stephen Harper", how quickly do you think Jojo would soften up?

I think she'd probably announce quickly that while she stands by her original point and remains a bit uncomfortable with this, maybe she was a little too quick to judge.

But I'm speculating. Okay, I'm not. I'm certain of it.

Gordo said...

"one Mary Ellen Douglas" is the scourge of the thinking people of Kingston. Her group has been silently picketing Kingston General Hospital for more than a decade because the hospital dares to provide women with safe and legal abortions.

Francis Walsingham said...

CC = Canadian Coward

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

Francis is a genius. Pass it on.