Sunday, May 18, 2008

The return of the mullet.


Oh, yawn ... apparently, the Twatrick is back, trolling desperately for readers in the comments sections here since no one will read his litter box of a blog. But here's Patsy in a recent post:

But even at 72 years of age, [Sen. John McCain] is still young at heart -- with the sense of humour of a man half his age.

Especially when he calls his wife a "cunt," right, Patsy? Apparently, that's cool if you're a conservative, is that how it works? Quite the role model you have there, Patsy. I guess calling someone a "cunt" is cause for sweaty pearl-clutching only if the speaker is a moonbat leftard. How utterly unsurprising.

BONUS TRACK: Apparently, Blogging Tory Mike McGuire is also cool with Teh Misogyny. Colour me shocked.

DOUBLE PLUS GOOD BONUS: In a delightful splash of irony, Blogging Tory "Neo Conservative" (who is, in reality, Kathy Shaidle) writes the occasional blog post involving the cuntalicious John McCain but, curiously, seems unfazed by McCain's intemperance towards his wife.

I say "curiously" since this is the same weaselly coward "Neo Conservative" who still, after many months, gets a savage case of the vapours whenever I use that word. Some pretty selective outrage you got going on over there, Neo. I guess it's OK if you're a Republican. It always is, isn't it?

27 comments:

Patrick Ross said...

Aw, but Cynic!

It's alright when you use that word, isn't it?

Don't bother: I can hear your lame excuses already.

"But, but, but... that's different!"

Zombie Jesus said...

Patty you silly little twat. Cynic isn't the one having vapours over someone using the word, ergo he doesn't need to temper his use of the word. Although I am pretty certain that he wouldn't use that word in response to a significant other making a light hearted remark about his hair in public.

However, those people, such as your self, who have attacked CC for daring to use that word have an obligation to do the same to John McCain, if it is indeed about the use of the word. If it is, as CC points out, just another in the long list of hypocritical attacks to the "left" side, while ignoring the same transgression on "right" side we will hear nothing about John McCain's verbal attack on his wife from the likes of you.

Given your track record I am certain this point will be one that will elude your grasp completely. But you are probably used to that feeling by now.

Patrick Ross said...

ROTFL

Does Cynic roll you clowns out from under park benches with the heroin needles still in your arms?

I'm pretty much in the dark on this one. So far as I can recall, I've never mentioned Cynic's gratuitous use of the word "cunt" -- although I have to admit I did notice it (who didn't?).

I'll tell you this much: if Cynic wants to bitch, cry and moan over John McCain using the word -- although cited by less-than-reputable sources -- then he'd better not be using it himself.

That's what hypocrisy is.

Now why don't you go back to the kids table and let me have a quick chat with Cynic here, mano-a-swine.

Patrick Ross said...

So what about it, douchebag?

Your lies aside -- I've never said anything about your great love of the word "cunt", although I do have my opinions about it -- how do you want to pretend that your repeated and, frankly, petulant use of the word is any better than McCain using it (reportedly, and by a less-than-reputable source) once?

Take your time with it. Let's see if we can get you to start being honest for probably the first time in your miserable life.

Cherniak_WTF said...

Given your track record I am certain this point will be one that will elude your grasp completely.

Bingo!

Again....

Patrick Ross said...

Hey. Cherni.

What I said for the dimwit goes fucking triple for you.

Cynic: right here. Right now. No more dishonesty, no more fantasy from you and your groupthinking little sycophantic douchebags. You can either start being honest, or start admitting you're a hypocrite.

(Or should I say start being honest by admitting you're a hypocrite?)

Let's hear it. What say you?

Red Tory said...

Seems business must be pretty slow over at the Nexus of Obscurity.

Patrick Ross said...

Business is just fine, Marty.

Now if you feebs aren't too busy passing around the notepad trying to brainstorm some comebacks, I'm waiting for a certain intellectual coward to start answering some questions here.

Still waiting, Cynic: what makes you think it's alright for you be using such sexist language if McCain's really has you reaching for the fainting couch?

Or is this just another one of your feeble attempts at a partisan hand grenade.

Red Tory said...

Yeah, I can tell by all the lively discussion over there.

Hey, why don't you give CC one of your "sociological lessons" and prattle on at great length about about how bog standard swear words and insults embody nefarious hierarchical prejudices beyond their semiotic meanings. That's always good for a snooze.

Patrick Ross said...

As I recall, you -- in your typical anti-intellectualism -- wanted no part of that lesson.

I'm not here to excuse the comments McCain made toward his wife -- that's a matter to be dealt with between the two of them.

I'm not going to compare McCain's remarks -- evidently made in anger -- to the calculated comments offered by Cynic, Lulu or Don Beemer.

I'm here to rub Cynic's face in his own hypocrisy.

And I'm entirely disinterested in what a fawning fuckwit like yourself has to say about it.

Now why don't you run on back to your sorry excuse for a blog and rage out another post because I reminded you of the fact that you're stupid? I have bigger fish to fry over here.

Zombie Jesus said...

Patty, the fact that you are unable to grasp such a simple concept doesn't really surprise me. But it does amuse me.

Oh, and I thank you for proving CC's point in your comment I'm not going to compare McCain's remarks -- evidently made in anger -- to the calculated comments offered by Cynic, Lulu or Don Beemer.

Now, for homework, explain why intemperate remarks made by John McCain in public to his wife are somehow less offensive then those made our hosts here.

Until you can explain this I am afraid we are just going to have to wait for the lesson on hypocrisy as I feel it will be far too advanced for someone as far behind as you evidently are.

Red Tory said...

You’re such a dismal bore, Fatprick. It’s not “anti-intellectual” to scoff at the laughable notion being lectured by a witless oaf like you.

Patrick Ross said...

You don't get it, do you, moron?

I have no interest in your comments. Whatsoever. I'm not even reading them.

I'm making this between myself and Cynic. His assorted mindless bootlickers aren't invited to this party.

Unless Cynic himself wants to decline the invitation. It's no different than any of his other implicit admissions of defeat.

Still waiting for your response, Cynic.

Patrick Ross said...

"You’re such a dismal bore, Fatprick. It’s not “anti-intellectual” to scoff at the laughable notion being lectured by a witless oaf like you."

I'm sure you like to pretend so, Marty, but then you get so mad every time I remind you how irredeemably stupid you are.

You so desperately want me to respect your intellect, and quite frankly, I never will. There's nothing there worthy of respect.

I'm respected by a wide variety of people a tremendous deal brighter than you are, Marty. So what you have to say about anything doesn't particularly fucking concern me.

Figure that out yet?

Patrick Ross said...

Still waiting on Cynic here.

Man up. Start answering for yourself. Let's leave the parrots out of this one -- that is, if you have the guts.

(Then again, we already know you don't.)

CC said...

Twatrick writes:

"I'm making this between myself and Cynic."

You only wish, Patsy. To paraphrase a well-known evolutionary biologist who explained why he regularly refused challenges for debate from pig-ignorant, Bible-whomping smegheads,

"A debate between the two of us might look good on their CV; not so good on mine."

Now why don't you toddle off, Patsy, and write some more blog posts that no one reads.

P.S. Hey, Patsy ... did you ever figure out the difference between triangles and octagons? Just curious.

Red Tory said...

You so desperately want me to respect your intellect...

LOL. Classic case of projection if ever I saw one.

It seems to me YOU are the one running around every blog puffing yourself up and attempting to convince folks of your self-declared massive intellect. It's pathetic really.

Red Tory said...

I'm respected by a wide variety of people...

Who speaks like this?

What a delusional twat.

LuLu said...

I'm respected by a wide variety of people...

*yawn*

Patsy, what you are is ridiculed by a wide variety of people. While the words might sound somewhat similar to someone as catastrophically delusional as yourself, their meanings are vastly different.

And you really need to start using your indoor voice if you want people to listen - no one likes a foot-stamping tirade from a six-year-old. When it's coming from a mullet-sporting, ignorant fuckwit in his late 20s, it's beyond pathetic.

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

"The sense of humour of a man half his age..."

So, Patrick, that makes you 36?

Ti-Guy said...

"A debate between the two of us might look good on their CV; not so good on mine."

I love this quote.

Did Twatsy pass out, finally?

Zombie Jesus said...

You don't get it, do you, moron?

I have no interest in your comments. Whatsoever. I'm not even reading them.


So, in other words, you cannot handle it. You don't want to actually debate the merits of what you are spewing because you are a coward as well as being completely intellectually out of your league with a stuffed iguana let alone with adults. This really isn't a hard point to grasp, but it once again has eluded you completely.

At this point we are left with two options.

Either you are a complete retard and you just don't understand the concepts of irony and hypocrisy.

Or you are attempting to reconcile the hypocritical actions of yourself and your brethren by trying to prove that the "other" side does it as well and just can't come up with anything all that good so you are stuck with material like this.

My personal guess it is a lot from column A and a little from column B.

Patrick Ross said...

So it's hypocrisy and intellectual cowardice it is then, huh, Cynic?

Colour me unsurprised.

Zombie Jesus said...

Did a chicken just cluck?

Patrick Ross said...

Cynic sure did.

Frank Frink said...

I'm respected by a wide variety of people...

LuLu? I think that means both Mom and Dad.

And the wide-eyed guy with the foot long beard in Oilers jammies who mutters to himself at the corner of Jasper NW and 108.

Red Tory said...

If Fatprick is any indication, his Mum & Dad might very well constitute a wide variety of people.