Friday, April 11, 2008
OK, then, I have ANOTHER theory ...
As a followup to an earlier post, here we have Kitty McVillain allegedly making a point with a direct and straightforward comparison of some figures.
Here, we have commenter "Friend of USA" smugly agreeing with the notion of taking those numbers at face value.
Here, we have commenter "Ted" passing on Paul Wells' analysis on how those numbers were generated very selectively.
And here, we have that same commenter "Friend of USA" suddenly getting all nuancy about the figures and arguing that it's unfair to just take those numbers at face value because of, you know, a bunch of other important stuff.