You know, I wouldn't mind so much being the target of drooling, slack-jawed criticism from Canada's Moron-o-sphere, but you think they'd at least be able to be moderately accurate in their slobbering (and thoroughly contrived) outrage.
Take the perpetually retarded "Girl on the Right," who opines thusly:
As much as I am loath to admit that there has to be a difference between men and women bloggers posting about the very same subjects (in this case politics), sadly there is. Take liberal Canadian blogger Canadian Cynic. He used to have a whole category labeled “Cunt”, ...
Um ... excuse me? I did? That's news to me, given that I'm so unspeakably lazy that I rarely categorize my posts in the first place, so it's highly unlikely that I'd have used that as a categorization phrase and not remembered it. In short, I'm willing to bet that GotR is (not surprisingly) full of shit. But it just gets piled higher and deeper from there, as GotR continues:
He used to have a whole category labeled “Cunt”, where he viciously maligned females in the news, and female bloggers.
Um, not quite, GotR. I only maligned as cunts those females in the news or female bloggers who were cunts. In short, I was actually fairly selective and focused with that insult, bestowing it only on those who so richly deserved it. Like you, GotR, you lying cunt. See how that works?
And, naturally, GotR's dishonest bullshit continues unabated:
He has since removed categories from his blog, probably because of the flack he was taking, though really, he never seemed to mind.
As I have already pointed out, I couldn't possibly have "removed" that category since it never in fact existed in the first place. But GotR is correct in that I really don't mind pulling out that insult on occasion when it's truly merited. Like now, GotR. You dumb cunt.
BY THE WAY, GotR, for someone who's supposed to be such a horrid, sexist misogynist, I'm actually revelling in the fact that one of my co-bloggers (LuLu) was the winner for "Best Snark Comment" in the recent "F-word Blog Awards," while my other co-pilot Pretty Shaved Ape was runner up for "Best Support Bro." In other words, we got some serious feminism going on here at CC HQ.
Match those credits, you insufferable twatwaffle.
YOU CAN TALK THE TALK ... Against my better judgment, I left a couple comments at GotR's place, in which I very clearly and cogently point out GotR's pathetic hypocrisy and dishonesty. Now, let's see if these people are capable of actually addressing the issues, or whether they just whine like petulant 8-year-olds.
I'm betting petulance. I'll give you odds.
41 comments:
So she actually uses the "C-word" to claim you have a category for it? She would not expect her readers to come over here, since she's now made simply coming here tantamount to insulting her.
Sounds like "I watch this porn so you won't have to".
What a silly bunt.
These ridiculous conservative harridans/racists have been moaning about the same thing for years now. Frankly, I think KKKate, KKKathy and Wonder Woman should be offended that this pearl-clutching is bringing skank-power into disrepute.
Twatwaffle? Almost sounds like you're tryin' to make it seem edible. And I ain't gettin' my mouth anywhere near that! I don't care how much syrup you pour on it!
Thanks for stopping by, Frank. Buh bye.
Mmmm, nothing starts the morning off right like a big stack of twatwaffles and syrup. Add a few blueberries and you are in heaven. No matter what Chimera thinks....
I call those fellatiating chicks like GotR some choice names myself.
(Fluff girlz for the great leader!)Of course that is applicable for many of the conserve bloggers in general. Even the "male" ones....lol.
I had no idea you were so sexist cc. I mean look at your blogroll...only...hmmmm. Hey. What do ya know? lots of women bloggers on there.....
15+ by my count....odd that hey?
"Add a few blueberries and you are in heaven. No matter what Chimera thinks...."
Wait! Blueberries? He didn't say there were blueberries! There's blueberries?
Not fair...
Fluff girlz for the great leader
It all starts with grown women calling themselves "girls" and not in a satirical way the women I know use it.
This is some weird backlash against the supposed unfeminine qualities of feminism, which makes me think people like RightGirl, are stuck in some time-warp, or she thinks tits, arse and the cooch (her blog is chock full of sexual imagery) are the only source of female power.
Who do they hate more? Other women, men, or themselves? It is a mystery. What it is, above all else, is embarrassingly infantile.
I think you just proved GotR's point.
Directing juvenile obscenities as you and your commenter's do at women with a different opinion than you is behaviour beneath contempt.
Was there something particular about civility you missed?
Quite right, db ... and the day all your fellow travellers on the Right stop collectively referring to all of us progressives as unhinged, deranged, terrorist-loving moonbats, you'll have the right to whine about it.
Until then, well, you might want to put a sock in it, know what I'm sayin'?
DB, take that comment over to Galloping Beaver. They'll give you a warm welcome.
Directing juvenile obscenities as you and your commenter's do at women with a different opinion than you is behaviour beneath contempt.
Oh pardon the fuck out of me, Mother Superior. In case you don't know, this is someone who suggests all Muslims should be persecuted because Islam is a cult of sex and death and that Indians spend their time fucking their daughters.
So, if you would like to defend the fair damsel in distress, go right ahead. But I think you need to learn the difference between civility and decency if you're going lecture other people about it.
ti-guy, I think that both decency and civility are foreign concepts to you, so save your outrage because trying to use the prior behaviour of others to excuse your own thuggery is weak.
As to the suggestion I put a sock in it - is that like David Suzuki declaring the debate is over?
What's next, jail?
Someone is commenting using a name "daily bayonet" that implies a threat to use a bayonet on me.
I feel threatened.
At least he/she/it knows he will go to jail should he attempt to bayonet me.
ti-guy, I think that both decency and civility are foreign concepts to you, so save your outrage because trying to use the prior behaviour of others to excuse your own thuggery is weak.
What thuggery? Do you even know what words mean?
As someone once said "Righwingers are quite often civil, but they're rarely decent."
Did you know that Hitler loathed swearing?
It was once suggested to Kate that she should sit down and have a talk with some of the kids who would be put into the Residential Schools that she had been calling for Canada to ressurect. Particularly those kids from the Possee in Saskatoon.
That was interpreted as a "threat" to her.
She calls for ALL indian children to be locked up in residential schools again as a "Final Solution" to the "Indian problem", as well as calling for the incaceration / internment of Indian activists and then... Oh The Vapours... She freaks out because it's suggested that she actually talk about this with Indians in her locale to get their feedback.
Clickty Click
Barbatrick... this is transformed into
"I'm being threatened!"
And yet her own behavior of trying to urge people to call CPS on me and regularly making snide and strange remarks about my children is considered above board.
She's a lying hypocritical fuckwit.
"There's blueberries?"
those berries are probably of the dangle variety....
KEvron
Kate... there's a real disconnect with reality there.
It seems like conservative bloggers are trying to do to the CC what CC and friends do them... they're just not that good at it. Part of it is that they're really trying to critique a critic, which is silly. Too harsh? Too juvenile? Too grounded in facts?
I also don't get why conservative bloggers fix it so that CC's links to their blogs get sent over to NAMBLA, or an anti-choice site, or whatever cause they're supporting this week. If the CC's bloggers are distorting their words, the best way to defeat the snark is for people to read for themselves exactly what they wrote.
Thanks for the easy win Ti-Guy.
Godwin's Law is invoked.
You lose.
My work here is done.
Oh, shoot. I didn't know you were that uninitiated.
Once again...Godwin's Law does not assert anything about the strength or weakness of an argument. It's simply a statement of probability that proposes that the longer an internet discussion goes on, the closer the probability that Hitler will be invoked approaches 1.
I mentioned Hitler as a shortcut to illustrating the difference between decency and civility (and it is a fact...Hitler couldn't abide swearing and all kinds of uncivil behaviour), but since you're unreachable/unteachable, it's a waste of time.
Oh...and you lost. Sorry.
Actually WeeWee, you mentioned Hitler because you have a two hundred word vocabulary and no new ideas.
Kinda like the rest of you dorks.
hey is that the phantom that used to troll mclelland's blog and brag about being a big tough dude that has a passionate love affair with firearms? or is this a differnet asshole called phantom?
Thanks for the easy win Ti-Guy.
Godwin's Law is invoked.
You lose.
My work here is done.
Sorry, Quirk's exception nullifies your invocation. You have therefore conceded.
Will you stop threatening me with that bayonet now?
The Phantom said "dorks" and WeeWee
heh heh heh heh heh
phantom's firearms and a bayonet, eh?
Typical.
"There's blueberries?"
I'm holding out for bacon.
And pie.
kinky, frink. we should party....
KEvron
Whoa. Blueberries AND BACON with syrup on twatwaffles. Now you've got my attention. I'm in a flap, you might say.
Uh, I'll be right back - I have to go jot something down for my wife.
Okay! ...Daily Bayonet, I have a question, and I'd like your thoughts, seriously. Tell me what you think is worse - knowingly publishing a lie, or calling someone a "cunt" (the category here is civility).
It's admittedly a bit Apples and Oranges-y, but just do your best.
ps - We're at the point now where invoking Godwin's law means you lose. Stay tuned for updates.
just for shits and giggles, let's call bayonet "courtney" and phantom "tyler"....
KEvron
"We're at the point now where invoking Godwin's law means you lose."
you goddam fäšcišt!
KEvron
Wow, all the big name elitists of the left in one thread! I am so glad I looked in.
Please carry on endearing progressivism to the masses.
I must ask liberal supporter, why do you always seem to feel threatened? You tried the same tack with me awhile back. Were you abused as a child?
Please explain.
Hey "jim", why don't you take your condescending sneering elsewhere. There are no "big name elitists of the left" here. Just average people, unwilling to allow the right wing extremists to spew their hate unopposed any longer.
I'm glad you did look in. It shows your masters are desperate, to bring the old warhorses back.
Funny thing is, you think we are here to "endear progressivism to the masses". You just don't get it. Most people already are what you would call "progressive". It is you that has to endear the masses. It is you that needs to lie and pull the wool over peoples' eyes.
The right wing extremists had to get well organized, years ago, in order to seize power, since they could never win on the merits of their views. So we're not trying to win anyone over, just make sure your talking points get refuted and are not allowed to go unopposed.
The weakness of the "left" is that we become complacent because we and most non-political people are essentially happy people. Naturally, enraged right wing extremists will have an advantage for a time, until the rest of us see that what you want is to destroy the society we have. Well, chum, we're awake now. Your goose is cooked and you know it. That's why they're all mobilized for one big push, hoping something will work. It won't.
why do you always seem to feel threatened?
Nice try at projection.
Were you abused as a child?
Wow, such an original piece of rhetoric. The price they pay for bringing you out of the woodwork.
Don't you find it hard to type with one hand while you finger your firearms with the other?
You are armed, right?
Sorry they had to call you out of retirement to try and change the Cadscam channel.
Won't work.
kinky, frink. we should party....
but, first ve dance!
big name elitists of the left?
Jim, did you get lost on your way to Cherniak's?
bada-bing
Well if refuting talking points involves hurling insults and fowl language, you folks most certainly do a great job.
Big name elitists of the left was my second choice, I actually had something very rude to say at first, but I didn't want to lower myself to your level so I changed it.
And hey, thanks for the passionate comeback LS. Nice to know I can still elicit such a response, maybe I will get a bonus on my payment from my shadowy overlords.
Don't be sorry that "they" called me out of retirement, I actually missed jousting with regressive dimwits like you.
I'd love to stay and chat but I have gun that needs cleaning. See you around the blogoshpere.
"There are no 'big name elitists of the left'"
speak for yourself.
KEvron
"I'd love to stay and chat but I have gun that needs cleaning."
you swingers and your jargon!
"See you around the blogoshpere."
i doubt it; fetish sites ain't my thing, cowboy.
KEvron
Wow, what a hateful, two-bit blogger you are. I find you pitiable and empty. I doubt very much whether you have ever had a fulfilling relationship with a woman, or any adult.
KEvron: " "There are no 'big name elitists of the left'"
speak for yourself."
Yeah, no kidding.
Post a Comment