Wednesday, March 05, 2008

I. Am. Vindicated. BOOYAH!!


Pay attention, kids, 'cuz here's how it works over at Wendy Sullivan's place:

... The students, by definition of their actions, were terrorists. And as typical ‘progressives’, meaning stupid publicity hunting liberals, released a PRESS RELEASE INCLUDING THEIR NAMES AND PHONE NUMBERS! Malkin just linked to their own press release.

And, golly gee, doesn't that sound vaguely familiar? Why, YES IT DOES!!!, since that's exactly what I did with respect to the NAMBLA-powered Richard Evans, posting absolutely nothing about him or his family other than information that was already in the public domain by his own hand.

And yet ... and yet ... when I did precisely what Malkin did, I was accused of threatening Dick's kids. Hideous double standard, anyone?

It is quite simply axiomatic that if you let conservative wingnuts ramble on long enough, they will eventually end up contradicting themselves completely and making absolute asses of themselves.

But you didn't need me to explain that, did you?

BY THE WAY, as commenter Ti-Guy points out, right-wing troglodyte Michelle Malkin wrote her legacy in stone when she viciously went after a 12-year-old accident victim whose only sin was to make a commercial promoting the U.S. SCHIP program which would increase medical coverage for more children.

Malkin's response? Like you had to ask:

Graeme Frost and the perils of Democrat poster child abuse Updated
By Michelle Malkin • October 8, 2007 10:35 AM

Update 7:30pm Eastern. Mark Steyn is uncowed by the unhinged…

The Democrats chose to outsource their airtime to a Seventh Grader. If a political party is desperate enough to send a boy to do a man’s job, then the boy is fair game. As it is, the Dems do enough cynical and opportunist hiding behind biography and identity, and it’s incredibly tedious. And anytime I send my seven-year-old out to argue policy you’re welcome to clobber him, too.


Yes, that would be Malkin, reproducing approvingly one Mark Steyn who has just declared that he's good with it being open season on 12-year-olds. And yet, strangely enough, while this continuous assault against Graeme Frost and his family was happening ... a curious silence from Canada's wingnuts. It's almost as if, well, they're all about the kids, unless those kids have liberal parents. Or something. Then they're "fair game."

Let us now make ourselves comfortable while Canada's right-wing imbeciles digest what I've just written, and slowly work themselves into a sense of outrage over Malkin's hideous and classless vindictiveness.

Psyche!

I was just kidding, of course. You knew I was kidding, right? Yeah, I was kidding.

37 comments:

Cherniak_WTF said...

But it's different when they do it...

Ti-Guy said...

This wasn't even Malkin's worst act...the one that forever branded her as stalkin' Malkin. That was when she held up a child for public humiliation and even stalked his home.

Frankly, she puts our Canadian harridans to shame, but since we have stricter laws about the use of publicly-available information, I can understand why.

Red Tory said...

Ah, I just love Thrilling Tales of the Obvious... Heh.

fergusrush said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

Yeah, but that's different, you bastard!

I don't know why yet. Must wait to be enlightened.

E in MD said...

You're forgetting the Cardinal Law: " It's Ok if a Conservative Does it"

Hey, where's fetusfetishistmomma? She can come tell us all about how it's not about depriving people of their rights it's all about saving the children.

I'm sure she probably still at the protest rally the right wing baby savers all had on the anniversary of Deamonte Driver's death ( Feb 28th ) from a tooth abscess that would have originally cost about $80 to fix if he'd been able to get some dental insurance.

Roundhead said...

umm, Canadian cynic -

this was of course Michelle Malkin's address that was put up on the web - with the intent by the posters that she should come to harm.

I guess you can't really condemn this, because Malkin is a grown adult...

but you've put up Richard Evans KIDS' names and addresses up on the web for everyone to see.

the key word: his KIDS. Not him. His KIDS. KIDS. You know, under-18...

Malkin = over 18
KIDS = under 18.

it's very easy even for you to figure out I guess

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

Richard published that information himself. Read through the whole thing to get a more complete picture.

Ti-Guy said...

Is this the same Roundhead who was exposed trolling from a Conservative Party of Canada computer?

Notice the lavishly-documented profile sans blog.

Where's your blog, Roundy?

E in MD said...

but you've put up Richard Evans KIDS' names and addresses up on the web for everyone to see.

By Blogger Roundhead, at 4:09 PM


No, Richard Evans put his information up on the net for everyone to see.

That information was about as secret as SWIFT. To toddle yourself back off to wingnutland.

Michelle Malkin did the exact same thing to Graeme Frost, a 7th grader. Naturally if you have a problem with CC's actions you denounce Michelle's right?

¢rÄßG®äŠŠ said...

Fucking right I do.

Love, Roundhead.

sharonapple88 said...

As long as we're Malkin bashing... why not throw in her targeting of Denice Denton, which may have lead to Denice Denton's suicide... Or the fact that she oppposes giving people citizenship to babies born in America... even though this is probably why her parents were allowed to stay in America.

KEvron said...

"the key word: his KIDS. Not him. His KIDS. KIDS. You know, under-18..."

you mean courtney and tyler?

KEvron

KEvron said...

"you've put up Richard Evans KIDS' names and addresses up on the web for everyone to see."

so did dickkk.

KEvron

Richard said...

I've not complained that my personal information was posted. CC's correct in his assertion that I posted my children's names myself. I don't have a problem with that.

Where I do have a problem is when he threatens to track my kids down and cause them harm.

Frank Frink said...

Where I do have a problem is when he threatens to track my kids down and cause them harm.

Which he has not done.

liberal supporter said...

But which Richard has done to others.

Richard said...

But which Richard has done to others.

Care to back that statement up?

frank said...

frank-fink,

Perhaps you should read the post cc put up on Feb. 28

liberal supporter said...

Care to back that statement up?
You first. You claim CC threatened to harm your kids.

Prove it.

frank said...

There's regular stupid, and there's liberal supporter-level stupid.

Thanks for the headline cc. Must give credit where credit is due.

liberal supporter said...

Still waiting for some proof.

You forgot to say "adscam" in your attempt to change the channel.

KEvron said...

"Where I do have a problem is when he threatens to track my kids down and cause them harm."

lol!

hey, ti-guy. remember that munchausen's by proxy you were talking about?!

KEvron

KEvron said...

"Perhaps you should read the post cc put up on Feb. 28"

done. still no threat. do i have to be drunk to see it?

KEvron

Zorpheous said...

Blogger Richard said...


Where I do have a problem is when he threatens to track my kids down and cause them harm.

I CALL BULLSHIT!!!

Where does Canadian Cynic threaten to do or cause your children harm Richard. Proof, the exact quote, and full context with the link.

While I think both you can CC are acting like wankers, it is clean you can only support your position be misrepresenting what CC said.

So time to pony Richard, the proof!

KEvron said...

dickkk et al know it's a lie, zorph. it's the papd acting up again. it's their defining trait.

KEvron

Zorpheous said...

Oh no Kevron,

You seeI have very good experience in these matters. You give Richard a clear chance to prove his case, because if Richard is really serious about this and concerned for his children's safety, when he has put together a very clear case file so that when he goes to police he is giving the police a clear and exact case for them to move one,...

Of course, that all hings on his real desire to file criminal charges, which of course he could have done already and should have done, if he was truly concern for his kids.

So now Rishard has upped the anti and is claiming Cynic has threaten to do harm to his children. If this is true, one phone to the police wpuld have Cynic in jail cell tonight!

So all beats areclosed, and I call!

Time to pony up Richard, put up or shut up!

KEvron said...

we're on opposite sides of the same nickle, zorph.

KEvron

Zorpheous said...

Yup, I also knotice Richard still hasn't ponied up his proof.

It like Anonalogue all over again, except we know who this crazy is.

Frank Frink said...

You forgot to say "adscam" in your attempt to change the channel.

And the still popular after 25 years - but... but... but... Trudeau!

Zorpheous said...

hmmmm,...

Still no proof from Dickie Dickie Dumbo,....

Oh look at kitten!!!!

CC said...

The NAMBLA-fixated Richard Evans continues to amaze ... and depress. Consider the following comment from above, reproduced verbatim:

"I've not complained that my personal information was posted. CC's correct in his assertion that I posted my children's names myself. I don't have a problem with that.

Where I do have a problem is when he threatens to track my kids down and cause them harm.
"

So ... first Dick admits that he posted his childrens' names. Dick has also publicly posted his home address and telephone number. But he has a problem with me "threatening to track his kids down."

Um ... Dick? I'm hoping you appreciate just how stupid you sound here. Really. You sound like a total retard. No one needs to track your kids down -- you've splashed their contact information all over the Intertoobz yourself.

And as for "threatening to cause them harm," I'm afraid you have that backwards. I'm the one who's constantly suggesting they should be taken away from you for their own safety. Especially little Tyler. I'm particularly worried about him.

As I've said before, the only constant amongst conservatives is that they lie. All the time.

Zorpheous said...

We are still waiting for the Proof Richard. You do understand that when you go to police they are going to ask you reproduce that proof Richard, they will not just simply take your word on. You see Richard, the police will be concerned that if you make a false statement that they act on and arrest someone and it turns out to false, or there isn't reasonable supporting evidence for the investigation and charge,... why the police could sued as well.

It is silly little point of law, but then again I understand the police are really big on the law.

So come on Richard, where's the proof? Where did CC threaten to harm your children?

CC said...

I'd let this one go, Zorph. I'm going to put together one more post regarding Dick, then I'm moving on and he's welcome to spend as many hours as he wants surfing NAMBLA and calling for my head on a platter.

E in MD said...

It is silly little point of law, but then again I understand the police are really big on the law.

By Blogger Zorpheous, at 9:07 AM


Unless of course it involves bashing the heads of restrained prisoners in with truncheons. Then not so much.

So come on Richard, where's the proof? Where did CC threaten to harm your children?

Damnit Zorph! What's with this obsession with facts and truth? The right wing don' need no steenking facts! They have 'faith' that they are right.

Does Kirk Cameron need facts to back up his assertion that a banana is proof that god exists? Hell no.

Does Ben Stein need facts to back up his assertion that ID is being forced out of science classes because it's threatening the Darwinian status quo and not because it's not science at all? No way!

Did fetisfetishistmomma need to cite proof to back up her assertion that the anti-abortion movement isn't about depriving people of choices or about controlling the populace or bending people to their will but rather about 'saving lives'? Of course not!

Bush didn't need truth or facts to march us all off to war so our sons and daughters could die in some foreign hell hole of our own creation?

So why should we hold Richard to an impossibly high standard like that? Obviously the right wing burden of truth should be set at: "I said it so it must be true". We can't expect any more than that from them. To do otherwise would be to challenge their 'faith'.

Zorpheous said...

E in MD,

This is just an intellectual exercise of closing the box Dickie Boy. Nothing more. So you give him the chance to make good, which both you and I know he can't.

So why go through all of this? Lets just say I have a good level of unfortunate experience.

CC needs to dot his "i"s and cross his "t"s in regard to Richard, so that if the unfortunate event takes place that Richard actually figures out who he is and outs CC. CC will have his asre covered.

From where I stand, Richard isn't acting like concerned parent, shit is I felt someone was threatenning a member of my family I would be going to the police. If it were my children,... I'd be screaming at the police to act and doing everything possible to protect them. But heck I'm kind of strange that way I want to protect the people I love and who love me. Maybe it's a leftist, moonbat, leftard quailty and one Richard lacks.

Anyhoo Richard. So where's the proof? We are still waiting?

Zorpheous said...

Blogger CC said...

I'd let this one go, Zorph. I'm going to put together one more post regarding Dick, then I'm moving on and he's welcome to spend as many hours as he wants surfing NAMBLA and calling for my head on a platter.

Good!!! Glad to hear it. Richard has marginalized himself enough already.