You're completely misrepresenting Mr. Ross's position...he believes we should invade Minnesota (and I'm sure I could find it, once I get hold of a map)...if not, then we're fascists.Honestly, I think people like Mr. Ross have a point sometimes about liberals. We often don't see the big picture.
"You're completely misrepresenting Mr. Ross's position...he believes we should invade Minnesota (and I'm sure I could find it, once I get hold of a map)...if not, then we're fascists." ....tiguyGoogle says....."It just never occurs to me to go parsing language and inventing reasons to turn what people say into something else." ------ tiguy Friday, June 8, 2007
kerryman number 1717 -- what does Google say about "sarcasm"? Have you tried that search yet? Wikipedia is good too.
Come on, Cynic. I don't consider you a liberal.That would be misrepresenting liberalism.
Dude, no one wants to read your blog. Shill somewhere else.
I wonder when Patrick will write a blog post complaining about the dismissal of Ward Churchill? I mean, one dangerous lunatic can be protected by a fake "free speech" screed, they all should, right?Ah, but he is buddies with Patels so that does explain a lot.
Having a dialogue with Pats is like talking to a vacuum cleaner.
W.O.W.Just W.O.W.I always knew you were immature Patrick Ross, I also knew you were far more capable of writing words than understanding them, but even for you this exercise regarding this matter and how desperately you have tried to make it into something it clearly is not reaches a new low in assholery all right. The irony that exists between the name of your blog as you intended it to be taken and the reality of it is one of the most painfully acute examples I have seen in a long time. I mean really, it is not just your lack of comprehension and your fixated nature upon your vision of reality no matter what facts, reason, and logic say to the contrary but also your mean spiritedness and your clear and obvious love of inflicting pain and suffering (at least that is clearly/obviously what you intend, you aren't actually very good at it in this medium except in terms of how painful simply reading your delusions is) upon those you dislike/disagree with, especially politically.I take politics far more seriously than you ever will, and I know full well that as important as it is to live totally through the lens of one's politics is to live a very narrow and rigid life and to deny much of the full human experience. This is why I say you are immature PR, not merely for the juvenility of your opinions and your attitudes towards those you disagree with but also because you have such a narrow and absolutist pov on things like politics, much like a child who is incapable of sufficiently complex abstract thought to handle the vagaries, complexities and shadings of gray/nuances that not just politics but life itself is full of.You are a very pitiable little boy at heart going/judging by your online persona and if your online persona is anything remotely an accurate reflection of your offline approach to life then I have great pity for those around you, especially those of much more mature minds that care for you despite your obvious limitations. I leave this here because I *KNOW* you well enough to not expect you to leave it posted or at the minimum to leave it unaltered, besides, it will get a lot more readership here than it could ever expect to get there no matter how much trolling of your site you do in the blogosphere, the quality of the work at this blog is orders of magnitude superior to yours and quality counts for a great deal regarding respectability in the online/blogging world in my experience, at least among real thinkers and not those that live via an ideological filter before all else that is.
Post a Comment