Thursday, August 02, 2007

The Great Canadian Debate. Resolved: Conservatives are imbeciles.


See, this is why you should never try to engage the Right in intellectual discourse -- they're idiots. Here, we have "Marginalized Action Dinosaur," being, quite simply, wrong about everything.

Retarded Porn Smuggling Expert Canadian Cynic, comes up with a drinking game.

Because “Canadian Cynic” is smarter than your average perv…”I can encrypt them. Or misname them. Or put them in hidden folders. Or just not bring them at all, and get them later via e-mail or from a web site. I mean, Jesus Christ, the possibilities are endless. Really, you’d have to pretty stupid to get caught smuggling porn on your computer.”


Ah. So, since I chose to blog about the ease with which one could theoretically smuggle pornography across international borders on one's laptop, that consequently makes me "smarter than your average perv" and a "porn smuggling expert." If you really need a refutation of that infantile claim, well, you're too stupid to be hanging out here and you should go read the Blogging Tories. In any event, onward:

First CC quotes re Richards assertion that no lefties complain re oprah, CC in all it’s wisdom can’t find one link in the entire blogosphere to refute LFR.

Wow ... the stupid here is breathtaking. Let's see what I was responding to, shall we?

The MoonBats are continually screaming about CEO compensation.

Except, it seems, when it comes to Oprah.

She pulls in 250 million/year and this is what we get from the left side of the blogosphere: [listen] [crickets chirping]

Why do you think that is?

It's because comparing Oprah's income, which she earns by her own efforts, is not comparable to that earned by CEOs, who can be incompetent cretins and still be granted obscene salaries by their boards of directors, so it has nothing to do with complaining about Oprah. I would have thought my point was self-evident but, apparently, there are still some people who need these things explained to them sloooooooowly and carefully. But, hilariously, it just gets better and better:

Then he goes on to say how wanting the troops to fail in afghanistan is how you support them. Lets do that with our Olympic team too hope they lose but support them any way,… Makes no sense to me but I’m not cc.

Again, too asinine to bother responding to (are you seeing a pattern here?). Moving on:

he says that lefties do like talk radio!

Let us examine the statement I was responding to, from the tediously stupid Dick Evans:

We can pretty much all agree that leftists hate talk radio, yes?

As the non-brain-damaged among you will realize, the counter-claim of the above is not that all lefties like talk radio, it is that some lefties like talk radio, a logical construction that MAD clearly fails to grasp.

I could go on, but what's the point. Poor MAD is, as Arnold Rimmer would say, "brimming over with wrongability." So let me leave you with the following telling statistic of MAD's putrid example of a web site:


I believe the expression "Once is more than enough" applies here, don't you think?

5 comments:

notnonny said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CC said...

Go away, Richard. You're not amusing anymore, you're just tedious.

And stupid. Don't forget stupid.

¢rÄbG®äŠŠ said...

I wonder what Dinosaur's first language is.

Niles said...

It's like you've become an initiation ritual here at CC Central. Your power in the Force must be increasing for them to come here and try to steal some of your fire.

David Webb said...

Ah crap, I resemble those stats.