Back here, Olaf takes a certain umbrage with my suggestion that he should be guilty by association:
I'd like to know on what grounds you suggest I'm "part" of Richard's behaviour, let alone passively accepting it?
There is a disclaimer on LFR, put up on my recommendation, saying "any posted opinions are that of the post author or individual commenters and do not necessarily reflect the views of the group as a whole." Period.
You have no idea of my "association" with Richard, much less to imply that I am somehow 'actively' a part of planning his free time, behaviour and interpersonal internet feuds.
Olaf is, of course, correct, and the fact that Richard Evans at "Let Freedom Reign" has classlessly registered the domain name canadiancynic.net and redirected it to his own site should in no way reflect upon Olaf's maturity as Richard's co-blogger at LFR because, well, Olaf is Olaf and Richard is Richard and it would be hideously irresponsible to use the childish actions of a single individual to criticize someone else.
In other news, "Canadian Cynic" sometimes uses bad words; therefore, all liberals are a bunch of angry, moonbat leftards. But you knew that already, right?
HERE, THWAP, LET ME CLEAR THIS UP FOR YOU: In the comments section, thwap is curious:
But what's really inspired me to comment is this "notcycles" dipshit.
Who is this guy?
Simple, thwap -- it's none other than Richard Evans, who hijacked the domain name of "cycles2k.com" out from under an established blogger cycles2k.blogspot.com, and promptly redirected that domain ... guess where, because that's such a knee-slappingly, hysterical thing to do when you're accusing other people of being unable to participate in a civil discussion.
Yeah, there's some serious irony here, isn't there?