Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Well, now that you mention it ...
"So you were against the invasion of Iraq, huh? You don't think we should have invaded and taken out Saddam, is that it? What are you saying -- that the Iraqis were better off under Saddam? Is that what you're suggesting? That they were actually better off under Saddam? Huh? Is that it?"
Um, well ... apparently, yes.
P.S. Countless wankers will undoubtedly turn up their noses at Blix's proclamation, given the utter contempt in which they hold him. After all, Blix was the spineless, gullible sap who suggested that Iraq had eliminated the majority of their WMDs years before the invasion.
Remind me again ... how did that turn out?