Saturday, December 17, 2005
Dear wankers: Is THIS enough for impeachment?
Seriously, if you genuinely believed that Bill Clinton should have been impeached over lying about a blowjob, I'm devilishly curious about where brazenly and blatantly breaking the law falls on your scale of misdeeds.
Go ahead, explain it to us. We're all listening.
AND THE NEW YORK TIMES CONTINUES ITS SLIDE INTO OBLIVION: And as I'm sure you've already read, it's not so much the illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens that makes this a story, it's that the New York Times (Journalistic motto: "Regurgitating Bush talking points since 2001".) has known of this for over a year, and chose not to mention it.
I'm betting the Times could just fire half its staff and fill space with White House press releases. You know ... eliminate the middleman, as it were.